OBC 2014 Review

This document is a review of the things that CanberraUAV did and did not do well at the 2014 OBC. It will serve as a starting point for how to improve our safety and reliability.

Things that went well

  • Transport to/from Kingaroy worked well for everyone
  • Accommodation was suitable, despite the 2.4km separation. The 3-bedroom house had plenty of room for workshops to be set up
  • Spares and tools were appropriate. No spares or tools left behind that we required
  • RFD900 modems worked extremely well with a decent SNR margin (around 40dB) during all sections of the flight
  • Camera and Imaging worked as expected
  • Bottle drop accuracy was extremely good with the wind calculations taken into account.
  • Failover between the 5.8 GHz and 900MHz links worked as expected
  • Waypoint tracking during the mission was very accurate, despite the strong winds
  • The “butterfly” overflight for Joe location refinement, wind estimation and bottle drop confirmation was very valuable and resulted in a much closer drop distance to Joe
  • Packup after the flight went smoothly

Things that did not go well

  • RC failsafe did not work during scrutineering. Some cables were loose too
  • Team interview – equalise the speaking parts a bit more
  • The trailer worked very badly when carrying the Porter. Due to the rough ground it was bouncing around significantly. Could have led to damage.
  • Could have reduced the convoy to 3 cars (GCS van, car with airframe, car with people and spares)
  • Ethernet switch was killed when it was accidentally connect to 12V power rather than a 7.5V UBEC
  • Checklist had multiple issues
  • Not enough practice with the checklist
  • Confusion over who was supposed to do which check item
  • Lack of communication between GCS and Pilot as to status of checks
  • Confusion of the lack of separation from checklist items and procedural items
  • No contingency plans for an aborted takeoff or landing
  • No contingency plans for dealing with technical failures (such as the compass)
  • Hard ground at the GCS made setting up the GCS tent (with pegs) difficult
  • No method to level the antenna tracker on un-level ground
  • Tent prevented visibility of the runway from the GCS operator stations
  • Antenna tracker required a some yaw but mainly pitch offsets to correctly track the UAV
  • Takeoff had many issues
  • Incorrect compass offsets
  • Not accounting for the strong crosswind
  • Lack of experience in launching in strong crosswinds
  • Abort procedures was too binary (STICK_MIXING was disabled)
  • Lack of communication between Pilot and GCS in relation to wind conditions
  • Matt’s GCS station had the incorrect (older) version of MAVProxy (due to last minute update of cuav repo for NMEA support)
  • 5.8GHz antenna had too small a beamwidth, made tracking difficult
  • Servo cables in the wings came out during roadtrip
  • Due to dropped radio packets, the “joe move” command to move the butterfly pattern to a new position did not move all the appropriate waypoints the first time
  • Confused communications between GCS, OBC Liaison and OBC Judges in regards to permission to return to airport
  • Landing issues:
  • UAV came in too fast due to too short approach
  • Flare point was too far down the runway
  • Lack of experience in landing in windy conditions
  • Too much focus on gaining extra points in the OBC, rather than on safety
  • No data on airframe safe limits (ie. max windspeed before operations are aborted)

Items to focus on

  • Checklists and procedures
  • Make them clearer (who does what)
  • Separate the checklist and procedure items
  • Practice them regularly
  • Abort modes and Contingencies
  • Write up clearer procedures for aborted takeoff, landing, etc
  • Practice them regularly
  • Automated takeoff and landing
  • APM code needs to be changed to be compass-independent
  • Need to test in a variety of conditions
  • Determine the maximum envelope for a “good” takeoff to guide saftey pilot decisions.
  • Tracking antenna
  • Perhaps replace with a couple of sector antennas
  • Need a method to level the antenna mast independent of ground/van level
  • Hard mounting of PixHawk may improve pitch accuracy
  • Create a safety management system for CanberraUAV
  • Checklists
  • Procedures
  • Tracking airframe and engine hours
  • Abort modes and contingencies
  • Ground Control Van
  • Potentially move the GCS into the van itself to reduce setup complexity
  • Integrate UBEC’s (don’t leave them separate) into any equipment connection to the 12V power system.
  • Better develop communications between Pilot and GCS
  • Practice more “full” setup (van, full GCS, etc) regularly with all team members on a regular basis.
  • Have a set of speaking points (regularly updated) that team members can use when talking about CanberraUAV, to ensure all team members have a similar level of knowledge about our operations.
  • Source Code Management
  • Continous build and integration of MAVProxy, cuav etc. with email notifications of each successful/failed build. i.e. when Tridge or someone else makes a change, we all know about it and can update our own setups.
  • Use the canberrauav git repo for deployment